In the interesting world of true crime on TikTok a popular channel called “true cime” (@crime.chron) was berated by several users. This was for using the Wojack animation style to illustrate serious criminal cases, victims, offenders and more. All the videos on the channel follow the same format, with a carton rendition of the build-up to the crime being displayed before a short insight in the story itself.
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-4474055489327117 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});As you’ll see later, the video caused an argument between some users and the account creator, which rasied questions about how to illustrate serious crime cases (especially ones involing sex crimes).
Here is an example of what we are referring to:
This is a clearly a very horrifying case, and the music, which is the same music used for all of the videos plays in the background, before a voice over starts. We see the real life people of the incident animated into Wojacks and displayed on the screen, often with weird contorted faces and reactions.
The video in question
One of the videos in question relates to the famous Menendez Brothers case, where the two brothers were sexually abused by their farther. Take a look for yourself below.
One of the top comments on the video relates to the illustration, and shares the opinion that these sorts of cases should be handled with respect, and not be animated using ‘meme-format’.
An argument insues
A commenter started to criticise the videos, calling out the format as ‘disrespectful’ and ‘tone deaf’ – see the exchange below.
‘Making wojacks about someone getting graped and a murder is beyond disgusting’
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-4474055489327117 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});The account owner was quick respond with:
‘Hi, we just aim to tell the stories in a unique way, we don’t intend to disrespect any of the victims or pick any side’
The user, not impressed with the explanation said:
‘Your adapting real crimes and victims into a meme format that’s not unique that’s tone deaf and just fucked up, sincerely did you put any real thought into this or are you just‘
A third user defended the account owner saying:
‘cry more buddy it’s not that deep’
With the user clapping back with: ‘No reading comprehension or basic empathy’
Finally, the owner chimed in, stating:
‘Hi again, Wojaks are not use in a meme format in my videos, they’re only used to represent the case in an accurate and sometimes dramatised format, We never did and we never will make fun or disrespect the people involved.’
The first user who commented then doubled down and said:
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-4474055489327117 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});‘Again wojacks are a meme ffs go if you drew everyone like pepe the frog it’s the same thing, doing so repeatedly is making fun of the victims and a complete lack of basic empathy’
@crime.chron then responded by saying:
‘Wojaks may have meme origins, but their use has evolved. In this context, they serve as neutral representations no different than animation or reenactments used in documentaries.’
Responding for a final time the user said:
‘They really haven’t been used for anything except memes and rage bait on Twitter git’s just disrespectful dude idk why you wanna die on this hill so badly’
Interestingly, there was no more back and fourth after this, as it seems both parties had expressed their reasons for what they believed in, with the original account owner continuing to post videos in this format.
The likelihood that they would change their format now is very low, as it’s the basis for the videos. In a sense, it’s a video hook, which immediately captures the users attention with a flashy animation.
However, as the first user stated, Wojacks are internet memes and have been ever seen they started to gain popularity. This article by Lifehacker explains it: The Out-of-Touch Adults’ Guide to Kid Culture – Lifehacker.
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-4474055489327117 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});If the account does not get any of the details wrong and pays respect in any way he can to the case, surely using Wojacks like this would not be much of a concern no?
That’s what some people think, however, this is the style of the account owners videos, and it is unlikely that he will change anytime soon.
More drama
Still need more content like this from controversey? Just check out the posts below.